<<Return to archives


July/August 2005


Predicting, Manipulating and Managing Tuber Yield Potential

The day is coming when seed potato growers will be able to customize their seed lots according to the areas where they will be grown. Each lot will be physiologically aged to produce the exact number of stems scientifically proven to produce an optimal marketable yield. Those numbers will be different for longer-season areas such as the Columbia Basin versus areas where the season is shorter.

Sound like pie in the sky?

Not according to Dr. Rick Knowles, Professor, Postharvest Physiology & Biochemistry Lab, Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman. His research shows that seed can be manipulated to come up with a whole range of stem numbers, and among those the ideal stem number for producing an optimal crop in a particular area can be identified.

“Right now, most growers pay little attention to stem numbers,” Knowles points out. “They select a seed grower, purchase their seed and then plant whatever they get. The larger operators monitor physiological age of their seed about like they do their planter settings. They may pay attention during the first trip down the field but then forget to re-check and see if anything has gotten out of whack. Their operations may be so big that they feel any economic loss will be hidden. Likewise, the economic importance of planting seed with the correct stem number is poorly understood.”

Management Strategies for Tuberworms in Potatoes
Why should potato growers be concerned about possible tuber worm damage in the Pacific Northwest, and can they afford to ignore having a management strategy in place?

Both questions took center stage during a May 26 teleconference discussion, “Management Strategies for Tuberworms in Potatoes,” sponsored by DuPont.

Participating on the panel were: Mel Martin, manager of raw product development, J. R. Simplot Co., Moses Lake, Wash.; Dr. Andy Jensen, director of research, Washington State Potato Commission; Phil Hamm, an extension plant pathologist at Oregon State University; Dale DeShane, president of Supervise Control Service Inc., Bakersfield, Calif..; and Dan Sherrod, product development manager, DuPont Technical Development, Memphis, Tenn.

Martin warned the listening audience of growers, field men and others involved in potato production that the economic risks are just too great to take the threat of a possible tuber moth infestation lightly.

Preparedness: An Educated Approach to “Perfect Potatoes”
“Four eyes” is a derogatory term in most situations. But not when it applies to scouting for potato insect problems in the Columbia Basin, says Todd Hines, an independent crop consultant and owner of Cascade Agronomics, Moses Lake, Wash.

The more eyes the better, especially this year, he says. Hines notes that the arrival of fairly new pests, such as the tuberworm and leafhopper, coupled with the presence of more traditional pest problems, such as the Colorado potato beetle, have generated a high level of concern among producers and fieldmen alike.

“ It’s pretty scary out here right now,” says Hines, who works with producers in eastern Washington.
And he’s not the only one who fears an onslaught of pests this season.

Some processors have adopted a zero tolerance level for worm presence in tubers, notes Denis Miller, DuPont district sales manager. “Processors cannot afford to have a worm show up in their products at the consumer level,” he says, adding that many processors have only a five percent tolerance level for tuberworm damage. He and other DuPont field staff are working closely with Washington potato producers to generate greater awareness for this critical pest problem, which many growers have not encountered before now.

“One live worm in a sample could result in the entire lot being rejected,” Miller says.


Potato Quality Improvements Shown in Oregon-Washington AuxiGro Study

By Dr. Terry A. Tindall
Senior Agronomist, J.R. Simplot Co.

Growing conditions in the Columbia Basin of Washington and Oregon seem to contain some of the most ideal conditions in North America to produce high-yield potatoes for processing. The processing contracts demands for higher quality tubers continue to push growers to finely tune management decisions. A grower’s decision to include inputs and products that were not available a few years ago may make a positive difference on both his yield and quality. Some of these emerging materials fall into the category of “soft chemistry,” such as AuxiGro, and may have a beneficial place on grower’s fields.

Nutritional requirements of N, P, K and other nutrients for a potato are high. This is especially true in the Columbia Basin where yields are approaching 50 tons (1000 cwt). As a plant grows and develops within these conditions, it is continually balancing internal requirements to sustain smooth tuber growth and to avoid abrupt changes that disrupt this growth. These are simple to state but difficult to obtain because of the challenges potato growers have in any area producing large yields with high processing quality.

HAREC Research Important to Columbia Basin Potato Industry
With current concerns about tuber moth in the Columbia Basin, potato research at the Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center (HAREC) in Hermiston, Ore., has taken on an even more important role.

Tuber moth research is No. 1 in terms of acreage committed to a particular project, according to Phil Hamm, Extension plant pathologist and the new station superintendent. Approximately five acres have been committed to various tuber moth studies underway.

The station is particularly valuable because the pest was first identified in the Pacific Northwest in the Hermiston area, Hamm, says. The number of moths being caught in pheromone traps is larger than anywhere else in the Columbia Basin. Whether that is due to warmer weather patterns in the southern part of the Columbia Basin or for other reasons, no one knows. However, what’s happening with the insect in the Hermiston area is being closely watched by the coalition of researchers from both sides of the Columbia River in pooling their expertise.

“Our tuber moth numbers here remain higher than in other parts of the Basin, but we know that the numbers north of us are higher than they were a year ago,” Hamm says. “This likely means the moths first established themselves here and are now spreading northward and taking up residence. With the tuber moth count expected to be higher at the end of the season than a year earlier, the risk of tuber damage this fall is likely higher over a larger area.”


Economic Impact Study Assesses Loss of Potato Farming

Washington State University (WSU) researchers have taken a look at what could happen if potato farms in the water-challenged Odessa aquifer region dried up and went away.

In 2005 the Washington State Potato Commission (WSPC) retained Dr. David Holland and Sanjoy Bhattacharjee of the School of Economic Sciences at WSU to measure the regional economic impact of a possible loss of potato production and subsequent potato processing due to a loss of irrigation water in an area known as the Odessa Sub-Basin.

The Odessa Sub-Basin is located in parts of Lincoln, Grant, Adams and Franklin counties, which include 35,611 acres of irrigated potato land that have been developed with private funds, using deep wells and pumping from the underlying aquifer.

The study measured the potential economic impact to the region if the area were to lose all, or part, of the irrigated potatoes and subsequent frozen potato processing. It also measured the economic impact to the area if these acres are converted back to summer fallow dry land wheat production.

The difference between growing irrigated potatoes and processing them into frozen potato products compared to dry land wheat production is enormous. An acre of irrigated potatoes and subsequent potato processing generates $17,700 of regional economic activity each year, of which $5,045 is attributed to growing the acre of potatoes and $12,655 per acre to processing. The total regional economic impact from an acre of dry land wheat in comparison is only $113.

 

© 2005 Columbia Publishing & Design   |  Potato Country   |  1-800-900-2452   |   Contact Us